Summary of Feedback on the Student Personal Device Use (Policy 8655)
(Generated by Thought Exchange)
This report provides an overview of the feedback received from participants in a December 2024 Thought Exchange regarding the implementation of the Student Personal Device Use (Policy 8655) in Loudoun County Public Schools. The Exchange aimed to gather insights on what is working well, what might be confusing, and what opportunities exist for improvement or clarification. The feedback was collected from students, parents, and teachers.
Key Findings: Positive Feedback
Increased Focus and Engagement: Many participants noted that the policy has significantly increased student focus and engagement in the classroom. Students are less distracted by their phones and more attentive to the lessons.
Example: "Students are more engaged and aware of the lessons because they are there to learn. Socialization can happen in more relaxed and natural engagements and exchanges in the classroom." (Rating: 3.8)
Reduction in Distractions: The policy has helped reduce distractions caused by personal devices, leading to a more conducive learning environment.
Example: "The policy is beneficial as it gets kids off their phones, which reduces distraction and decreases chances of cheating." (Rating: 3.9)
Improved Social Interactions: Participants appreciated that students are now more likely to interact with their peers face-to-face, fostering better social skills and a sense of community.
Example: "Students are more collaborative and actively engaged without cell phones and listening devices." (Rating: 3.8)
Consistency Across Schools: The consistent implementation of the policy across different schools has been praised, as it ensures uniformity and fairness.
Example: "Whole county policy has been helpful with implementation. It is easier for staff to execute with confidence as all schools have similar expectations." (Rating: 4.1)
Key Findings: Areas of Confusion
Policy Enforcement: There is some confusion regarding the consistent enforcement of the policy across different classrooms and schools. Participants noted that not all teachers are implementing the policy uniformly.
Example: "Not all staff members are implementing device policies with fidelity. It's frustrating for students to not have consistent expectations to follow." (Rating: 3.7)
Use of Smartwatches: The policy's stance on smartwatches is unclear to many participants. Some students use smartwatches to bypass the policy, leading to confusion and inconsistency.
Example: "Smartwatches are an issue and difficult to monitor. Students are texting friends/family and/or using a calculator, which is not appropriate during instructional time." ( 3.4)
Emergency Situations: Concerns were raised about students' ability to contact parents or emergency services during a crisis if their phones are not readily accessible.
Example: "If there is an emergency, students' devices are expensive, and students have the right to be able to carry their personal device around." (Rating: 3.1)
Opportunities for Improvement:
Clear Communication and Guidelines: Participants suggested clearer communication and guidelines regarding the policy, especially concerning smartwatches and emergency protocols, would be beneficial.
Example: "Clarify 'such expectations may include between classes or at lunch & only in specific areas of the school.' Clarify that this is for high school only!" (Rating: 3.6)
Consistent Enforcement: Ensuring that all teachers and staff consistently enforce the policy will help reduce confusion and improve compliance.
Example: "Consistency among all staff members is a must! If not all staff members are implementing the policy in a uniform way, there is confusion among the students as to the legitimacy of the policy." (Rating: 3.9)
Consideration for Special Circumstances: Participants recommended that the policy account for special circumstances, such as medical or special educational needs.
Example: "Students with vision accommodations should be encouraged to use their cell phones as needed, for magnification, photographing board instructions, etc." (Rating: 3.4)
Conclusion
The feedback from the survey indicates that the implementation of Policy 8655 has positively impacted student focus, engagement, and social interactions. However, there are areas that require further clarification and consistent enforcement to ensure the policy's effectiveness. By addressing these concerns and improving communication, LCPS can continue to create a productive and distraction-free learning environment for all students.
Recommendations
Enhance Communication: Provide additional clear and detailed guidelines about the policy, with a focus on clarifying emergency protocols and the use of smartwatches.
Ensure Consistency: Implement measures to ensure all staff members enforce the policy uniformly across all schools.
Accommodate Special Needs: Continue to consider special circumstances and provide accommodations for students with specific needs.
We appreciate the valuable feedback from all participants and are committed to making the necessary improvements to support our students' learning and well-being.